Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Multimedia Plus, Inc. v. Playerlync LLC, No. 16-2574 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2574
Decided
August 16, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MULTIMEDIA PLUS, INC., MULTIMEDIA

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

PLAYERLYNC LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-2574

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:14-cv-08216-WHP, Judge William H. Pauley, III.

JUDGMENT

BARRY EVAN NEGRIN, Kane Kessler, P.C., New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. RYAN AFTEL TYZ, Tyz Law Group PC, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 16, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Multimedia Plus, Inc. v. Playerlync LLC, No. 16-2574 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02574-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02574-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.