Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Vehicle Interface Technologie v. Jaguar Land Rover, No. 16-2537 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2537
Also Docketed
No. 16-2538 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
June 13, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit VEHICLE INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-2537, 2016-2538

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:12-cv-01285-RGA, 1:14-cv-00339-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT E. FREITAS, Freitas Angell & Weinberg LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DANIEL J. WEINBERG, JOSHUA YOUNG. GABRIEL BELL, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MATTHEW J. MOORE, JAMES BENDER; CLEMENT J. NAPLES, New York, NY; LISA K. NGUYEN, Menlo Park, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Vehicle Interface Technologie v. Jaguar Land Rover, No. 16-2537 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02537-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02537-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error