Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Eleven Engineering, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 16-2439 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2439
Also Docketed
No. 16-2489 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ELEVEN ENGINEERING, INC., ELEVEN

ENGINEERING GAME CONTROL LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

2016-2439, 2016-2489

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:09-cv-00903-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN ERIK HAAN, Lee Sheikh Megley & Haan LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LEE, ASHLEY E. LAVALLEY, RICHARD BURNS MEGLEY, JR.

JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH, Fish & Richardson, P.C., San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by PROSHANTO MUKHERJI,

2Boston, MA; ISABELLA FU, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Eleven Engineering, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation, No. 16-2439 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02439-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02439-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error