Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Appistry, LLC v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 16-2417 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2417
Decided
February 10, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPISTRY, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON WEB SERVICES,

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-2417

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:15-cv-01416-RAJ, Judge Richard A. Jones.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY G. SIMON, The Simon Law Firm, P.C., St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY DAVID KRIEGER, BENJAMIN R. ASKEW, MICHAEL P. KELLA.

ALAN M. FISCH, Fisch Sigler, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ROY WILLIAM SIGLER, JENNIFER ROBINSON, JEFFREY MATTHEW SALTMAN; DAVID M. SAUNDERS, San Jose, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Appistry, LLC v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 16-2417 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 10, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02417-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02417-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.