Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Travel Sentry, Inc. v. David Tropp, No. 16-2386 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2386
Also Docketed
No. 16-2387, No. 16-2714, No. 17-1025 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
December 19, 2017
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

February 14, 2018

ERRATUM

Appeal Nos. 2016-2386, 2016-2387, 2016-2714, 2017-1025

TRAVEL SENTRY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

DAVID A. TROPP,

Defendant-Appellant

DAVID A. TROPP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CONAIR CORPORATION, BRIGGS & RILEY

TRAVELWARE LLC, EBAGS, INC., EAGLE CREEK,

A DIVISION OF VF OUTDOOR, INC., HP

MARKETING CORP., LTD., L.C. INDUSTRIES, LLC,

MAGELLAN'S INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL

CORPORATION, MASTER LOCK COMPANY LLC,

OUTPAC DESIGNS INC., SAMSONITE

CORPORATION, TRAVELPRO INTERNATIONAL

INC., TRG ACCESSORIES, LLC, TUMI, INC.,

22 TRAVEL SENTRY, INC. v. DAVID TROPP

WORDLOCK, INC.,

Defendants-Cross Appellants

VICTORINOX SWISS ARMY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

TITAN LUGGAGE USA, DELSEY LUGGAGE INC.,

Defendants

Decided: December 19, 2017

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: On page 20, line 30, replace “constrains” with “constraints.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Travel Sentry, Inc. v. David Tropp, No. 16-2386 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02386-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02386-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.