Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

GoDaddy.com, LLC v. RPost Communications Limited, No. 16-2335 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2335
Decided
May 5, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GODADDY.COM, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RPOST COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED, RMAIL

LIMITED, RPOST INTERNATIONAL LIMITED,

RPOST HOLDINGS INCORPORATED,

Defendants-Appellants

2016-2335

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 2:14-cv-00126-JAT, Senior Judge James A. Teilborg.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN W. LACORTE, Ballard Spahr LLP, Phoenix, AZ, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by JONATHON A. TALCOTT, JESSICA A. WILSON.

LEWIS EMERY HUDNELL, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, argued for defendants-appellants.

2MAXIMILIAN A. GRANT, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae Endurance International Group, Inc. Also represented by GABRIEL BELL, ABIGAIL A. RIVES; RICHARD GREGORY FRENKEL, Menlo Park, CA.

CASEY L. GRIFFITH, Griffith Bates Champion & Harper LLP, Dallas, TX, for amicus curiae Raymond A. Mercado, Ph.D

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 5, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GoDaddy.com, LLC v. RPost Communications Limited, No. 16-2335 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02335-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02335-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.