Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE, No. 16-2325 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2325
Decided
April 10, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY

LIMITED, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA,

INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE, SUN

PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-2325

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 3:14-cv-04616-MLC-TJB, Judge Mary L. Cooper.

JUDGMENT

ARLENE L. CHOW, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by ERIC J. LOBENFELD, THOMAS SCHMIDT.

MARK DAVID SCHUMAN, Carlson, Caspers, Vandenburgh, Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., Minneapolis, MN,

2argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by SAMUEL T. LOCKNER, JONATHAN CARPENTER, CAROLINE MARSILI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and DYK,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. Sun Pharma Global FZE, No. 16-2325 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 10, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02325-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02325-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error