Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Xilinx, Inc., No. 16-2323 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2323
Decided
April 12, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

XILINX, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-2323

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:16-cv-00925-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

JUDGMENT

NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO, JAY D. ELLWANGER.

MATTHEW J. SILVEIRA, Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by PATRICK THOMAS MICHAEL; DAVID B. COCHRAN, Cleveland, OH.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG v. Xilinx, Inc., No. 16-2323 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02323-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02323-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error