Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, No. 16-2272 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 20, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2272
Also Docketed
No. 16-2273 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 20, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VOTER VERIFIED, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v

PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., A

DELAWARE CORPORATION, DIEBOLD,

INCORPORATED, AN OHIO CORPORATION,

ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC., A

DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees 2016-2272, 2016-2273

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in Nos. 6:09-cv-01968-CEM-KRS, 6:09-cv-01969-CEM-KRS, Judge Carlos E. Mendoza.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY ITALO PROVITOLA, DeLand, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ROBERT M. EVANS, JR., Senniger Powers LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by KYLE G. GOTTUSO, MARC WADE VANDER TUIG.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and

REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 20, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, No. 16-2272 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 20, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02272-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02272-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error