Rembrandt Gaming Technologies v. Boyd Gaming Corporation, No. 16-2249 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2017) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

REMBRANDT GAMING TECHNOLOGIES, LP,

Plaintiff-Appellant

BOYD GAMING CORPORATION, WMS GAMING,

INC., LVGV, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

NEW CASTLE CORP., RAMPARTS, INC.,

MANDALAY CORP., CIRCUS CIRCUS CASINOS, INC., VICTORIA PARTNERS, BELLAGIO, LLC,

MGM GRAND HOTEL, LLC, THE MIRAGE CASINO-

HOTEL, NEW YORK-NEW YORK HOTEL &

CASINO, LLC, ARIA RESORT & CASINO

HOLDINGS, LLC, CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT

OPERATING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendants

2016-2249

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in No. 2:12-cv-00775-MMD-GWF, Judge Miranda M. Du.

JUDGMENT

2RACHEL ZIMMERMAN SCOBIE, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, CHRISTOPHER C. DAVIS, CHRISTOPHER J. SORENSON, EMILY WESSELS; JEFFREY BLAKE, Atlanta, GA. TIMOTHY COLIN MEECE, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER GALFANO, MICHAEL JOSEPH HARRIS, AUDRA CAROL EIDEM HEINZE, BRYAN MEDLOCK, JR.; DAVID P. ENZMINGER, Winston & Strawn LLP, Menlo Park, CA; PATRICK MICHAEL MCCARTHY, Howard & Howard Attorneys, PLLC, Ann Arbor, MI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 21, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

Rembrandt Gaming Technologies v. Boyd Gaming Corporation, No. 16-2249 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 21, 2017).

govinfo ID

USCOURTS-ca13-16-02249-0

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02249-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.