Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Trading Technologies Intl. v. Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC, No. 16-2223 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2223
Decided
October 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ROSENTHAL COLLINS GROUP, LLC,

FUTUREPATH TRADING, LLC, TRADEHELM,

INC.,

Defendants

TRADESTATION SECURITIES, INC., IBG LLC,

INTERACTIVE BROKERS LLC, TRADESTATION

GROUP, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-2223

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Nos. 1:10-cv-00715, 1:10-cv-00716, 1:10-cv-00718, 1:10-cv-00720, 1:10-cv-00721, 1:10-cv-00726, 1:10-cv-00883, 1:10-cv-00884, 1:10-cv-00885, 1:10-cv-00929, 1:10-cv-00931, Judge Virginia M. Kendall.

JUDGMENT

2LEIF R. SIGMOND, JR., McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL DAVID GANNON, JENNIFER KURCZ, COLE BRADLEY RICHTER; STEVEN BORSAND, Trading Technologies International, Inc., Chicago, IL.

DAVID J. HEALEY, Fish & Richardson, PC, Houston, TX, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Tradestation Securities, Inc., Tradestation Group, Inc. also represented by BAILEY KATHLEEN HARRIS; ADAM J. KESSEL, Boston, MA.

MICHAEL BRETT LEVIN, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, for defendants-appellees IBG LLC, Interactive Brokers LLC. Also represented by NATALIE J. MORGAN, San Diego, CA; GIDEON A. SCHOR, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Trading Technologies Intl. v. Rosenthal Collins Group, LLC, No. 16-2223 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02223-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02223-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.