Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

NexusCard, Inc. v. The Kroger Co., No. 16-2074 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-2074
Also Docketed
No. 16-2077 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 9, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NEXUSCARD, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

KROGER CO.,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-2074, 2016-2077

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:15-cv-00961-JRG, 2:15-cv-00968-JRG, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

ADAM BAUMLI, Baumli Law Firm PLLC, Dallas, TX, for plaintiff-appellant. WILLIAM P. ATKINS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BRIAN CHRISTOPHER NASH, Austin, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

NexusCard, Inc. v. The Kroger Co., No. 16-2074 (Fed. Cir. May 9, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-02074-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-02074-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.