Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hand Held Products, Inc. v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 16-1906 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1906
Decided
June 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit HAND HELD PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., AMZN MOBILE LLC,

AMAZONFRESH LLC, A9.COM, INC., A9

INNOVATIONS LLC, QUIDSI, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-1906

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00768-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN RICHARD LUECK, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MATTHEW L. WOODS, ANDREW JOSEPH KABAT, SHIRA T. SHAPIRO; DANIELLE ROSENTHAL, New York, NY.

DAVID BENYACAR, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by DANIEL REISNER, DAVID SOOFIAN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and STOLL, Circuit Judg-

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hand Held Products, Inc. v. amazon.com, Inc., No. 16-1906 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01906-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01906-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error