Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Fo2go LLC v. Pinterest, Inc., No. 16-1903 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1903
Also Docketed
No. 16-1904, No. 16-1905 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 13, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FO2GO LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PINTEREST, INC., SMUGMUG INC., TUMBLR,

INC., YAHOO! INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-1903, 2016-1904, 2016-1905

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:15-cv-00097-RGA, 1:15-cv-00099-RGA, 1:15-cv-00101-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

DAVID R. BENNETT, Direction IP Law, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN BRAUERMAN, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE.

MARK A. LEMLEY, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Pinterest, Inc., Tumblr, Inc., Yahoo! Inc. also represented by RYAN M. KENT.

2JERRY ROBIN SELINGER, Patterson & Sheridan LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee SmugMug Inc. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Fo2go LLC v. Pinterest, Inc., No. 16-1903 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01903-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01903-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error