Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

CallWave Communications LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 16-1684 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1684
Also Docketed
No. 16-1685, No. 16-1686, No. 16-1687, No. 16-1688 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 10, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AT&T MOBILITY LLC, GOOGLE INC., VERIZON SERVICES CORP., CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA

VERIZON WIRELESS, T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

BLACKBERRY LIMITED, BLACKBERRY

CORPORATION,

Defendants

2016-1684, 2016-1685, 2016-1686, 2016-1687, 2016-1688

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:12-cv-01701-RGA, 1:12-cv-01702-RGA, 1:12-cv-01703-RGA, 1:12-cv-01704-RGA, 1:12-cv-01788-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

GREGORY SCOTT BISHOP, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also repre-

2sented by CHARLES FOSTER KOCH; WILLIAM D. BELANGER, LEINWEIH ANDREW TSENG, Boston, MA.

DAN L. BAGATELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Hanover, NH, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Google Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., also represented by RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM, Seattle, WA; VICTORIA Q. SMITH, Palo Alto, CA.

JOSEPH P. ZAMMIT, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee AT&T Mobility LLC. Also represented by JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Washington, DC; DANIEL LEVENTHAL, BRETT ASHLEY MCKEAN, Houston, TX.

KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendants-appellees Verizon Services Corp., Cellco Parnership, dba Verizon Wireless. Also represented by KARIN A. HESSLER, ROBERT JAMES SCHEFFEL.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 10, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

CallWave Communications LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 16-1684 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 10, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01684-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01684-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.