Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Net Talk.Com, Inc. v. magicJack VocalTec Ltd., No. 16-1683 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1683
Decided
April 6, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NET TALK.COM, INC., A FLORIDA

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAGICJACK VOCALTEC LTD., AN ISRAEL

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MAGICJACK

HOLDINGS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE

CORPORATION, FKA YMAX HOLDINGS

CORPORATION, MAGICJACK LP, A DELAWARE

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Defendants-Appellants

MICHELE BORISLOW, PERSONAL

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DANIEL

BORISLOW,

Defendant

2016-1683

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 9:12-cv-81022-DPG, Judge Darrin P. Gayles.

JUDGMENT

2MATTHEW MCANDREWS, Niro McAndrews LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by KYLE WALLENBERG.

DARRYL MICHAEL WOO, Vinson & Elkins LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by JANICE TA, STEPHEN C. STOUT, Austin, TX.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 6, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Net Talk.Com, Inc. v. magicJack VocalTec Ltd., No. 16-1683 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 6, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01683-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01683-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error