Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, No. 16-1559 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2018)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1559
Also Docketed
No. 16-1893, No. 16-1894 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
May 4, 2018
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

July 19, 2018

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2016-1559, 2016-1893, 2016-1894 ENERGY HEATING, LLC, AN IDAHO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, ROCKY MOUNTAIN

OILFIELD SERVICES, LLC, AN IDAHO LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY,

Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants

MARATHON OIL CORPORATION, MARATHON OIL

COMPANY,

Third-Party Defendants-Cross-Appellants

v.

HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC, A LOUISIANA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, SUPER HEATERS NORTH DAKOTA, LLC, A NORTH DAKOTA LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellants Decided: May 4, 2018

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes:

22 ENERGY HEATING, LLC v. HEAT ON-THE-FLY, LLC

On page 16, lines 34–35, delete:

HOTF did not object Replace the deleted language with:

no one objected

On page 17, lines 24–27, delete:

Energy, however, also called Mr. Lind, who testified that, according to Mr. Kelley, Mr. Lyles had mentioned the patent to Mr. Kelley. HOTF did not object to Mr. Lind’s testimony. Replace the deleted language with:

HOTF, however, subsequently called Mr. Lind as an adverse witness. HOTF elicited from him the same allegedly hearsay statements to which Mr. Powell had earlier testified and to which HOTF had previously objected. No one objected to Mr. Lind’s testimony.

On page 17, lines 29–30, delete:

On this unusual record where HOTF did not object to Mr. Lind’s testimony, Replace the deleted language with:

On this unusual record, where HOTF itself elicited Mr. Lind’s testimony,

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Energy Heating, LLC. v. Heat On-The-Fly, LLC, No. 16-1559 (Fed. Cir. May 4, 2018).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01559-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01559-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.