Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Golden Bridge Technology, Inc v. apple Inc., No. 16-1537 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1537
Decided
January 27, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GOLDEN BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-1537

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:12-cv-04882-PSG, Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal.

JUDGMENT

JACK A. RUSSO, Computerlaw Group LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

LOWELL D. MEAD, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by TIMOTHY TETER, BENJAMIN G. DAMSTEDT; ERIN TRENDA, San Diego, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Golden Bridge Technology, Inc v. apple Inc., No. 16-1537 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 27, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01537-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01537-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error