Fed. Cir.

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 16-1530 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2017)

Errata

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 16-1530
Also Docketed: No. 16-1623 (consolidated; same document)
Decided: March 1, 2017
Judge: —
Document: Errata
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

March 1, 2017

ERRATA

Appeal Nos. 2016-1530, 2016-1623 BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG, BAYER

CROPSCIENCE NV,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, MYCOGEN PLANT

SCIENCE, INC., AGRIGENETICS, INC., DBA

MYCOGEN SEEDS, LLC, PHYTOGEN SEED

COMPANY, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants

Decided: March 1, 2017

Non-Precedential Opinion

Please make the following changes: On page 7, lines 35–36, change “before September 16, 2011” to “on or after September 16, 2011.” On page 18, line 12, change “Bayer” to “Dow.” On page 27, line 21, change “January 15, 2015” to “January 15, 2016.”

22 CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. LEE

On page 28, line 3, change “January 15, 2015” to “January 15, 2016.”

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bayer CropScience AG v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, No. 16-1530 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2017).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-16-01530-1
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01530-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error