Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

St. Clair Intellectual Proper v. Toshiba america Inc., No. 16-1355 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1355
Decided
November 8, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ST. CLAIR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

CONSULTANTS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TOSHIBA AMERICA INC.,

TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA

INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

APPLE INC.,

Defendant

2016-1355

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:09-cv-00354-KAJ, Circuit Judge Kent A. Jordan.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by JOANNA ZHANG; ARTHUR A. GASEY, OLIVER YANG, Niro Law, Ltd., Chicago, IL.

2JEFFREY K. SHERWOOD, Blank Rome LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR., GABRIELLA E. ZICCARELLI.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (TARANTO, BRYSON, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

St. Clair Intellectual Proper v. Toshiba america Inc., No. 16-1355 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 8, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01355-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01355-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error