Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

GT Nexus, Inc. v. Inttra, Inc., No. 16-1267 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1267
Decided
October 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GT NEXUS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

INTTRA, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant

2016-1267

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:11-cv-02145-SBA, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.

JUDGMENT

BORIS FELDMAN, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ROBIN L. BREWER, STEFANI E. SHANBERG, San Francisco, CA. MICHAEL JOHN LYONS, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by AHREN CHRISTIAN HSU-HOFFMAN, DAVID VINCENT SANKER, LINDSEY M. SHINN, WALTER SCOTT TESTER; THOMAS M. PETERSON, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

GT Nexus, Inc. v. Inttra, Inc., No. 16-1267 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01267-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01267-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.