Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank, No. 16-1179 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2017)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1179
Also Docketed
No. 16-1180, No. 16-1181 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 27, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PARUS HOLDINGS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SALLIE MAE BANK, NAVIENT SOLUTIONS INC., PNC BANK, N.A., SUNTRUST BANK, SUNTRUST

MORTGAGE INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-1179, 2016-1180, 2016-1181

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-01427-SLR, 1:14-cv-01428-SLR, 1:14-cv-01429-SLR, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, Reston, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by NATHAN K. CUMMINGS, JONATHAN GARWOOD GRAVES; LOUIS JAMES HOFFMAN, Hoffman Patent Firm, Scottsdale, AZ.

LIONEL M. LAVENUE, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees PNC Bank,

2N.A., Suntrust Bank, Suntrust Mortgage Inc. also represented by DANIEL CRAIG COOLEY; SHATON C. MENZIE, Atlanta, GA.

LUKE PEDERSEN, BAKER Botts, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Sallie Mae Bank.

JASON W. COOK, McGuireWoods LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-appellee Navient Solutions Inc. Also represented by BRIAN DAVID SCHMALZBACH, Richmond, VA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Parus Holdings Inc. v. Sallie Mae Bank, No. 16-1179 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 27, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01179-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01179-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.