Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Concaten, Inc. v. AmeriTrak Fleet Solutions, LLC, No. 16-1112 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1112
Decided
October 11, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CONCATEN, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AMERITRAK FLEET SOLUTIONS, LLC, DBA

AMERITRAK,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-1112

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in No. 1:14-cv-00790-PAB-NYW, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

CARL ALFRED HJORT, III, Concaten, Inc., Golden CO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID A. PALLADINO.

LOREN LEE HANSEN, Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD C. LANDON, DEAN CONRAD EYLER.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Concaten, Inc. v. AmeriTrak Fleet Solutions, LLC, No. 16-1112 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 11, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01112-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01112-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.