Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Stopinc aktiengesellschaft v. J.W. Hicks, Inc., No. 16-1102 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1102
Decided
July 19, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit STOPINC AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

J.W. HICKS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2016-1102

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in No. 2:14-CV-238-PPS-JEM, Judge Philip P. Simon.

JUDGMENT

Gerard F. Dunne, Law Office of Gerard F. Dunne, P.C., New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Dale Randall Brown, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Fort Wayne, IN, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Alice Jane Springer, Elkhart, IN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Stopinc aktiengesellschaft v. J.W. Hicks, Inc., No. 16-1102 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01102-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01102-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.