Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Hawaiian Telcom, Inc., No. 16-1082 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 26, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1082
Also Docketed
No. 16-1083 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 26, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BROADBAND ITV, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HAWAIIAN TELCOM, INC., OCEANIC TIME

WARNER CABLE, LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE,

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2016-1082, 2016-1083

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in Nos. 1:14-cv-00169-ACK-RLP, 1:15-cv-00131-ACK-RLP, Judge Alan C. Kay.

JUDGMENT

FREDERICK A. TECCE, Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLP, Philadelphia, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KEITH AARON JONES, JOHN DAVID SIMMONS; PAUL ALSTON, JOHN S. RHEE, Alston, Hunt, Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI. SASHA G. RAO, Maynard Cooper & Gale LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee Hawaiian

2Telcom, Inc. Also represented by ALEXANDRA DRURY, BRANDON H. STROY; WILFORD EDWARD BAILEY, JOHN COWLES NEIMAN, JR., Birmingham, AL. CHARLES KRAMER VERHOEVEN, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendants-appellees Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC, Time Warner Cable, Inc. Also represented by CARL G. ANDERSON, DAVID EISEMAN, IV; DEEPA ACHARYA, PHILIP CHARLES STERNHELL, Washington, DC; JOSEPH MILOWIC, III, New York, NY; DAVID BENYACAR, DANIEL REISNER, Kaye Scholer LLP, New York, NY. ROBERT GREENSPOON, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC, Chicago, IL, for amicus curiae United Inventors Association of the United States of America. ARTHUR STEVEN BEEMAN, Arent Fox LLP, San Francisco, CA, for amicus curiae Tranxition, Inc. Also represented by JOEL MUCHMORE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 26, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Hawaiian Telcom, Inc., No. 16-1082 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 26, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01082-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01082-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.