Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

PCT International Inc. v. Holland Electronics, LLC, No. 16-1061 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 16-1061
Decided
August 16, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PCT INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HOLLAND ELECTRONICS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant

2016-1061

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 2:12-cv-01797-JAT, Senior Judge James A. Teilborg.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER K. LARUS, Robins Kaplan LLP, Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ERIC JOHN MAGNUSON, JAMIE R. KURTZ, JOHN K. HARTING, BRYAN MECHELL.

SID LEACH, Snell & Wilmer, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, argued for defendant-appellant. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 16, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

PCT International Inc. v. Holland Electronics, LLC, No. 16-1061 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-16-01061-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-16-01061-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error