Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Moddha Interactive, Inc. v. Philips Electronics, No. 15-2048 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-2048
Decided
June 13, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MODDHA INTERACTIVE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC,

DOES 1-20, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants

2015-2048

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii in No. 1:12-cv-00028-BMK, Magistrate Judge Barry M. Kurren.

JUDGMENT

RANDALL KEITH SCHMITT, McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon, LLP, Honolulu, HI, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JESSICA M. WAN.

2BRIAN ROSENTHAL, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ALAN M. GRIMALDI, BRIAN ANDREA, PAUL WHITFIELD HUGHES; KYLE E. FRIESEN, Houston, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and

CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 13, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Moddha Interactive, Inc. v. Philips Electronics, No. 15-2048 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-02048-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-02048-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error