Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Novo Transforma Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., No. 15-2012 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 23, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-2012
Also Docketed
No. 15-2013, No. 15-2014, No. 15-2015, No. 15-2016 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
September 23, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P., NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC., T-MOBILE US

INC, TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC., UNITED

STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION, CELLCO

PARTNERSHIP, D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-2012, 2015-2013, 2015-2014, 2015-2015, 2015-2016

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos. 1:14-cv-00612-RGA, 1:14-cv-00613-RGA, 1:14-cv-00614-RGA, 1:14-cv-00615-RGA, 1:14-cv-00616-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN DANIEL BAKER, Farney Daniels PC, San Mateo, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL D. SAUNDERS, GURTEJ SINGH, Georgetown, TX.

2JARED BOBROW, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees T-Mobile US Inc., Tracfone Wireless, Inc. also represented by ANNE MARIE CAPPELLA; ROBERT T. VLASIS, III, Washington, DC. JASON W. COOK, McGuireWoods LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendants-appellees Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., Nextel Operations, Inc. Also represented by DAVID EVAN FINKELSON, BRIAN DAVID SCHMALZBACH, Richmond, VA. DOUGLAS LEWIS, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, IL, for defendant-appellee United States Cellular Corporation. Also represented by STEVEN J. HOROWITZ. KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership. Also represented by KARIN A. HESSLER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 23, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Novo Transforma Technologies v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., No. 15-2012 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 23, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-02012-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-02012-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.