Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Commonwealth Laboratories v. QuinTron Instrument Company, No. 15-2010 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-2010
Decided
May 19, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit COMMONWEALTH LABORATORIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

QUINTRON INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2015-2010

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 1:14-cv-20083-PAS, Judge Patricia A. Seitz.

JUDGMENT

JAY F. UTLEY, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by ERIN M. CHOI; JODI PANDOLFI, LEE STAPLETON, Miami, FL.

DANIEL R. JOHNSON, Ryan, Kromholz & Manion, S.C., Milwaukee, WI, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH A. KROMHOLZ; LAWRENCE DEAN GOODMAN, Devine Goodman Rasco & Watts-FitzGerald, LLP, Miami, FL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 19, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Commonwealth Laboratories v. QuinTron Instrument Company, No. 15-2010 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-02010-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-02010-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.