Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Freight Tracking Technologies v. Virginia International, No. 15-1920 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1920
Decided
June 22, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit FREIGHT TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS, LLC,

NOW SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1920

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:13-cv-00708-AWADEM, Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen.

JUDGMENT

STEVEN ARTHUR MADDOX, Maddox Edwards, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KAVEH SABA; KEVIN PAUL ANDERSON, BRIAN PANDYA, ROBERT JAMES SCHEFFEL, JAMES HAROLD WALLACE, JR., Wiley Rein, LLP, Washington, DC.

CAROLYN CHANG, Fenwick & West, LLP, Mountain View, CA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also repre-

2sented by BRIAN EDWIN LAHTI, YIXIN ZHANG, HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 22, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Freight Tracking Technologies v. Virginia International, No. 15-1920 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01920-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01920-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error