Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wonderland Nurserygoods Co. v. Thorley Industries LLC, No. 15-1878 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1878
Decided
April 8, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WONDERLAND NURSERYGOODS CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

THORLEY INDUSTRIES LLC, DBA 4MOMS,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1878

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:12-cv-00196-NBF, Judge Nora Barry Fischer.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL TALLITSCH, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID I. ROCHE.

DANIEL H. BREAN, The Webb Law Firm, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KENT E. BALDAUF, JR., BRYAN P. CLARK.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wonderland Nurserygoods Co. v. Thorley Industries LLC, No. 15-1878 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01878-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01878-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error