Fed. Cir.

Arunachalam v. Fremont Bancorporation, No. 15-1831 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2017)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 15-1831
Decided: January 9, 2017
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM,

Plaintiff-Appellant

FREMONT BANCORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, FREMONT BANK, A CALIFORNIA

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1831

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:15-cv-00023-EDL, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.

JUDGMENT

LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM, Menlo Park, CA, pro se. RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, for defendants-appellees. Also represented by LANE M. POLOZOLA.

2THIS CAUSE having been submitted on the briefs and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 9, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arunachalam v. Fremont Bancorporation, No. 15-1831 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2017).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-15-01831-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01831-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error