Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., No. 15-1782 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 21, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1782
Decided
April 21, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KROY IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SAFEWAY, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1782

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:12-cv-00800-WCB, Circuit Judge William C. Bryson.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY P. MALONEY, Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by JOSEPH F. MARINELLI, ALISON AUBRY RICHARDS, NICOLE L. LITTLE; STEVEN C. SCHROER, Boulder, CO.

JAMES CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by KIRSTEN RYDSTROM; GERARD M. DONOVAN, Washington, DC; CHRISTINE M. MORGAN, WILLIAM ROSS OVEREND, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 21, 2016 /s/ Daniel E O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Safeway, Inc., No. 15-1782 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 21, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01782-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01782-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.