Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bayer Intellectual Property v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, No. 15-1716 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1716
Decided
April 12, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BAYER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GMBH,

BAYER PHARMA AG,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1716

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-01032-GMS, Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

JUDGMENT

MATTHEW R. FORD, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by SHARON DESH.

CHRISTOPHER NEIL SIPES, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ERIC RITLAND SONNENSCHEIN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 12, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bayer Intellectual Property v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, No. 15-1716 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01716-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01716-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.