Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Chizmar v. Acco Brands Corporation, No. 15-1715 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1715
Decided
February 8, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JAMES S. CHIZMAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION, STAPLES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1715

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:14-cv-02181-PKC, Judge P. Kevin Castel.

JUDGMENT

ZACHARY DAVID SILBERSHER, Kroub Silbersher & Kolmykov PLLC, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by SERGEY KOLMYKOV, GASTON KROUB.

CHAD S.C. STOVER, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Chizmar v. Acco Brands Corporation, No. 15-1715 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01715-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01715-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.