Fed. Cir.

Berry v. Ford Motor Company, No. 15-1699 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 15-1699
Decided: February 8, 2016
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JOSEPH J. BERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FORD GLOBAL

TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1699

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 5:11-cv-10569-JCORSW, Judge John Corbett O'Meara.

JUDGMENT

DOUGLAS SPRINKLE, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP, Troy, MI, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MORGAN GOODSPEED, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by JESSICA LYNN ELLSWORTH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Berry v. Ford Motor Company, No. 15-1699 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-15-01699-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01699-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error