Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wireless Media Innovations v. Maher Terminals, LLC, No. 15-1634 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1634
Also Docketed
No. 15-1635 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
February 8, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WIRELESS MEDIA INNOVATIONS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MAHER TERMINALS, LLC, GLOBAL TERMINAL &

CONTAINER SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees 2015-1634, 2015-1635

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Nos. 2:14-cv-07004-JLL-JAD, 2:14-cv-07006-JLL-JAD, Judge Jose L. Linares.

JUDGMENT

DAVID P. SWENSON, Farney Daniels PC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by STEVEN R. DANIELS, Georgetown, TX.

R. DAVID DONOGHUE, Holland & Knight, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ANTHONY J. FUGA; CINDY NGOC-YEN PHAM, Denver, CO.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (CHEN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wireless Media Innovations v. Maher Terminals, LLC, No. 15-1634 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01634-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01634-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error