Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Intelligent Verification v. Majesco Entertainment Co., No. 15-1603 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 19, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1603
Decided
January 19, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTELLIGENT VERIFICATION SYSTEMS, LLC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MAJESCO ENTERTAINMENT CO., MICROSOFT

CORP.

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1603

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:12-cv-00525-AWALRL, Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT J. KENNEY, Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL K. MUTTER, QUENTIN R. CORRIE, JOHN DANIEL VICTOR FERMAN, LYNDE FAUN HERZBACH.

AHMED JAMAL DAVIS, Fish & Richardson, PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Microsoft

2Corp. also represented by RUFFIN B. CORDELL; JOHN WINSTON THORNBURGH, San Diego, CA.

ZACHARY DAVID SILBERSHER, Kroub Silbersher & Kolmykov PLLC, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee Majesco Entertainment Co. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 19, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Intelligent Verification v. Majesco Entertainment Co., No. 15-1603 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 19, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01603-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01603-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error