Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Barron v. Scvngr, Inc., No. 15-1596 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 5, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1596
Decided
February 5, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JACK BARRON,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SCVNGR, INC., DBA LEVELUP,

Defendant-Appellant

2015-1596

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 4:13-cv-40084-TSH, Judge Timothy S. Hillman.

JUDGMENT

JOHN O. MIRICK, Mirick O’Connell DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, Worcester, MA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. FINE. BRIAN CARL CARROLL, SCVNGR, Inc. d/b/a LevelUp, Boston, MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by PHILIP C. SWAIN, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 5, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Barron v. Scvngr, Inc., No. 15-1596 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 5, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01596-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01596-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.