Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc., No. 15-1564 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1564
Decided
May 5, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC., A FLORIDA

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TAYLOR MADE GOLF COMPANY, INC., A

DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1564

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-02974-JLSWVG, Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

JUDGMENT

JACQUELINE TADROS, Jacqueline Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MELVIN KENNETH SILVERMAN, Melvin K. Silverman & Associates, P.C., Pompano Beach, FL.

BRIDGETTE A. AGNESS, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by GARY A. CLARK.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Triple Tee Golf, Inc. v. Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc., No. 15-1564 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01564-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01564-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error