Fed. Cir.

Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Time, Inc., No. 15-1550 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 15-1550
Decided: December 16, 2015
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WORLDWIDE HOME PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff

TIME, INC., BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,

COHESION PRODUCTS INC., SHERRY HANSON,

Defendants

JEFFREY SONNABEND,

Movant-Appellant

2015-1550

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:11-cv-03633-LTS-MHD, Judge Laura Taylor Swain.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY SONNABEND, Sonnabend Law, Brooklyn, NY, argued pro se.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Worldwide Home Products, Inc. v. Time, Inc., No. 15-1550 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-15-01550-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01550-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error