Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Aero-Stream, LLC v. SepticairAid, LLC, No. 15-1542 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2016)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1542
Also Docketed
No. 15-1569 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 13, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

AERO-STREAM, LLC,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

SEPTICAIRAID, LLC, ARTIE ZABEL,

Defendants-Appellants

2015-1542, 2015-1569

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in No. 2:12-cv-00190-LA, Judge Lynn Adelman.

JUDGMENT

S. EDWARD SARSKAS, Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP, Milwaukee, WI, for plaintiff-cross-appellant.

MICHAEL T. HOPKINS, IP-LitigationUS, LLC, Milwaukee, WI, for defendants-appellants. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 13, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aero-Stream, LLC v. SepticairAid, LLC, No. 15-1542 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01542-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01542-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.