Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

UltimatePointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 15-1532 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1532
Also Docketed
No. 15-1535, No. 15-1584 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
March 1, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ULTIMATEPOINTER, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

NINTENDO CO., LTD.,

NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

2015-1532, 2015-1535, 2015-1584

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in No. 2:14-cv-00865-RSL, Judge Robert S. Lasnik.

JUDGMENT

CHARLES JOHN ROGERS, Conley Rose, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL JAMES GUTHRIE, THOMAS WARDEN, GREGORY LOREN MAAG.

MARK CHRISTOPHER NELSON, Dentons US LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by STEVEN M. GEISZLER, RICHARD SALGADO; JERRY A.

2RIEDINGER, TYLER C. PETERSON, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 1, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

UltimatePointer, L.L.C. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd., No. 15-1532 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01532-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01532-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error