Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Priceplay.com, Inc. v. AOL advertising, Inc., No. 15-1492 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1492
Also Docketed
No. 15-1589, No. 15-1660 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
January 7, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PRICEPLAY.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AOL ADVERTISING, INC., FACEBOOK INC.,

GOOGLE INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1492, 2015-1589, 2015-1660

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00092-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews, United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Nos. 3:14-cv-04830-SI, 3:14-cv-04828-SI, Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

SCOTT DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DARRIN A. AUITO.

DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee Google Inc., also

2represented by PAUL ALESSIO MEZZINA; ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC. Appellee AOL Advertising, Inc., also represented by GEORGE FRANK PAPPAS, PETER ANDREW SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. Appellee Facebook Inc., also represented by HEIDI LYN KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, LAM K. NGUYEN, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MICHAEL GRAHAM RHODES, San Francisco, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 7, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Priceplay.com, Inc. v. AOL advertising, Inc., No. 15-1492 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01492-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01492-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error