Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Baseball Quick, LLC v. MLB advanced Media, L.P., No. 15-1403 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1403
Decided
December 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BASEBALL QUICK, LLC, A NEW YORK

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P., A DELAWARE

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

DOES, 1 THROUGH 5, INCLUSIVE,

Defendant

2015-1403

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 1:11-cv-01735-KBF, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

JUDGMENT

JAMES M. BOLLINGER, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TIMOTHY P. HEATON, JOSHUA A. BERMAN, PHOENIX S. PAK; PAUL E. MCGOWAN, Atlanta, GA; MATTHEW D. MURPHEY, ERIC M. JAEGERS, Irvine, CA.

2CYNTHIA RIGSBY, Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee, WI, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MICHELLE A. MORAN, KEVIN J. MALANEY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Baseball Quick, LLC v. MLB advanced Media, L.P., No. 15-1403 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01403-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01403-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error