Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Halo Creative & Design v. Comptoir Des Indes Inc., No. 15-1375 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2016)

Errata Correction sheet to a previously issued opinion
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1375
Decided
March 14, 2016
Judge
Document
Errata
Length
1 page

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

March 17, 2016

ERRATUM

Appeal No. 2015-1375

HALO CREATIVE & DESIGN LIMITED, HALO TRADEMARKS LIMITED, HALO AMERICAS

LIMITED,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

COMPTOIR DES INDES INC., DAVID OUAKNINE,

Defendants-Appellees

Decided: March 14, 2016

Precedential Opinion

Please make the following change: On page 15, replace the sentence Costs to appellees. with the following sentence: Costs to appellants.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Halo Creative & Design v. Comptoir Des Indes Inc., No. 15-1375 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 14, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01375-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01375-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.