Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Repros Therapeutics Inc. v. Fisch, No. 15-1328 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2016)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1328
Decided
January 7, 2016
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

REPROS THERAPEUTICS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HARRY FISCH,

Defendant-Appellant

JOSEPH S. PODOLSKI, RONALD WIEHLE,

Defendants

2015-1328

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas in No. 4:13-cv-02266, Judge Vanessa D. Gilmore.

JUDGMENT

ALLYSON NEWTON HO, Morgan, Lewis & Brockius LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DAVID W. CLOUGH, JOHN W. CAMPBELL, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CABRAL, Chicago, IL; WINSTOL D. CARTER, JR., CRAIG A. STANFIELD, RYAN B. MCBETH, NICHOLAUS E. FLOYD, Houston, TX.

2MICHAEL ANTHONY NICODEMA, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Florham Park, NJ, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by BARRY SCHINDLER, JULIE PAMELA BOOKBINDER, New York, NY; ELLIOT H. SCHERKER, JOSE PENA, STEPHANIE L. VARELA, Miami, FL; MICHAEL J. SCHAENGOLD, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 7, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Repros Therapeutics Inc. v. Fisch, No. 15-1328 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 7, 2016).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01328-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01328-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error