Fed. Cir.

Morales v. Square, Inc., No. 15-1319 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 15-1319
Decided: October 16, 2015
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FERNANDO MORALES,

Plaintiff-Appellant

SQUARE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2015-1319

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 5:13-cv-01092-DAE, Senior Judge David A. Ezra.

JUDGMENT

FERNANDO MORALES, Rancho Viejo, TX, pro se.

STEFANI E. SHANBERG, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, San Francisco, CA, for appellee. Also represented by ROBIN L. BREWER; DAVID H. KRAMER, Palo Alto, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM .

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

COSTS

Costs awarded to Square, Inc. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 16, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Morales v. Square, Inc., No. 15-1319 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2015).

govinfo ID: USCOURTS-ca13-15-01319-0
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01319-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error