Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nuevolution A/S v. Pedersen, No. 15-1284 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1284
Also Docketed
No. 15-1285 (consolidated; same document)
Decided
July 19, 2017
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NUEVOLUTION A/S, PETER BIRK RASMUSSEN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

HENRIK PEDERSEN, CHEMGENE HOLDING APS,

Defendants-Appellees 2015-1284, 2015-1285

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:14-cv-00357-CMHTCB, Senior Judge Claude M. Hilton.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN FREIMAN, Wiggin and Dana LLP, New Haven, CT, argued for plaintiff-appellant Nuevolution A/S. Also represented by DAVID R. ROTH; JAMES BICKS, Stamford, CT. RICHARD L. BEIZER, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant Peter Birk Rasmussen. Also represented by TIFFANY WYNN.

2TURNER PEARCE SMITH, Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by KEVIN ARTHUR MEEHAN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and LINN,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nuevolution A/S v. Pedersen, No. 15-1284 (Fed. Cir. July 19, 2017).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01284-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01284-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 25, 2026 · Report an error