Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Cloud Satchel, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., No. 15-1261 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 15-1261
Decided
December 17, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CLOUD SATCHEL, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

BARNES & NOBLE, INC., AMAZON.COM,

Defendants-Appellees

2015-1261, 2015-1262

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-00942-SLR-SRF, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

JUDGMENT

DAVID P. SWENSON, Farney Daniels PC, Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER THOMAS.

ABBY M. MOLLEN, Barlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellees. Appellee Barnes & Noble, Inc., also represented by JAMES S. BLACKBURN, Arnold & Porter, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; MATTHEW WOLF, Washington, DC; Willow White Noonan, San Francisco, CA. Appellee Amazon.com also represent-

2ed by ADAM MORTARA, Bartlit Beck Herman Palenchar & Scott LLP, Chicago, IL; JEFFREY H. DEAN, Amazon.com, Inc., Seattle, WA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cloud Satchel, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc., No. 15-1261 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 17, 2015).

govinfo ID
USCOURTS-ca13-15-01261-0
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/USCOURTS-ca13-15-01261-0

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.